Which best describes Hinchliffe et al.'s view on urban life?

Prepare for the Environmental Geography Test. Dive into flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Boost your environmental knowledge for the exam!

Multiple Choice

Which best describes Hinchliffe et al.'s view on urban life?

Explanation:
Urban life, for Hinchliffe and colleagues, is entangled with a variety of non-human life forms that actively shape how cities function and how urban spaces are governed. They push a cosmopolitical view in which diverse beings—plants, animals, microbes, and other ecological processes—are agents in urban politics and design, influencing outcomes and power relations. So describing cities as including diverse non-human life forms that shape urban environments aligns exactly with that perspective. The other ideas—that non-human life is kept out of shaping cities, that urban nature is static, or that humans are the only actors—don’t fit because they ignore the dynamic, multispecies, process-oriented view this approach emphasizes.

Urban life, for Hinchliffe and colleagues, is entangled with a variety of non-human life forms that actively shape how cities function and how urban spaces are governed. They push a cosmopolitical view in which diverse beings—plants, animals, microbes, and other ecological processes—are agents in urban politics and design, influencing outcomes and power relations. So describing cities as including diverse non-human life forms that shape urban environments aligns exactly with that perspective. The other ideas—that non-human life is kept out of shaping cities, that urban nature is static, or that humans are the only actors—don’t fit because they ignore the dynamic, multispecies, process-oriented view this approach emphasizes.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy